Created for Tim Slade's Design Challenge, this scenario-based course combines introduction of the GROW coaching model through interactive e-learning with embedded branching scenario quizzes and an AI voice-enabled chat to allow learners to actively practise the material covered.
People managers who are preparing for performance review conversations with their direct reports (namely, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians)
Storyboard, Graphic Design ensuring brand consistency, AI prompter.
Mindsmith
Gilbert’s employees encounter a wide range of performance challenges. Shifts are typically hectic, and employees juggle phone calls, in-person customers, insurance rules, and filling scripts. The technical acumen required to measure, mix, or count hundreds of drugs demands accuracy and attention to detail under the law. To ensure patients take their prescriptions as directed, pharmacists and technicians educate them and answer questions. This results in employees not dealing well with customers in person and runs the real risk of dangerous and/or costly errors being made when filling prescriptions.
As Gilbert’s has grown over the past 85 years, its core values have remained the foundation of customer care. During performance review conversations, people managers use the GROW Coaching Model to help employees identify obstacles and take ownership of their improvement.
A scenario-based course that reminds managers of the coach to GROW model and Gilbert's values. Branching scenario tasks were interspersed with learning content in order to avoid cognitive overload. A scaffolded approach to learning is taken through these, culminating in the opportunity for learners to practise the GROW coaching method in a 'sandbox' activity in the form of a conversation with an AI playing the role of coachee. This allows managers to feel confident having real-life conversations before they take place during the performance review process.
The authoring tool stipulated for the design challenge was Mindsmith and I was keen to trial this tool and compare it to more traditional authoring tools such as Articulate Storyline.
I began by uploading branding materials and assets and also by providing the AI with a detailed prompt as part of the initial needs analysis as shown below. I then sense-checked the generated storyboard and decided to create and edit the slides suggested from within the slide editor.
After the initial ideas and storyboard generated by AI, I noticed that the story behind the learning experience needed adjustment. For example, I think that using named characters in the narrative makes for a more authentic learning experience. When left to the AI to generate these, the same predictable names are generated (Jordan, Maria,) and so I created original names for the learning myself.
In addition, I wanted to create character consistency throughout the course, and so I prompted the AI to do this. However, a drawback is that the tool cannot easily place the same character within instructional pages of the course and on the branching scenario involving the same character as the latter uses preset characters. As a work-around to this problem, I removed the character image of Carmella from the start of the learning so that it seems more authentic when the learner meets her in the branching scenario later. In addition, the embedded AI character generation is not as efficient or realistic as other tools I have used. I prompted and iterated several times within Mindsmith to create the finished character of Theo, with the name badge and branding within the image taking several prompts to perfect.
Having read and sense-checked the narrative of the course from start to finish, it needed tweaking for consistency and to make better sense. I therefore prompted the AI to include a pharmacy manager, Theo, that the learner was going to follow and help through the learning process, giving a more immersive feel to the learning process. In addition, the AI had automatically selected 'Will' to be represented by the 'W' in the 'GROW' Coaching acronym, but I edited this to 'Way Forward' as this would have more meaning for learners. I also prompted to include a slide showing the learner the positive consequences of effectively coaching Carmella through the branching scenario tasks, generating and tweaking the 'Friday Afternoon' slide. Showing learners consequences, both good and bad, can increase the impact of the learning by creating an emotional response in the learner:
I uploaded the provided 'Gilbert's' brand style guide & logo assets into Mindsmith. The colours were provided in the RBG colour model and so I needed to manually change the provided RGB Values to Hex in order for them to be compatible with the Mindsmith Tool. I then updated the theme with colour and fonts stipulated within the branding style guide. I prompted to include the logo in the correct place on the page and so that it appeared throughout the course. I then provided an additional prompt to make the colours used as titles readable but also visually appealing:
For the assessment, the learner was provided with an information card about a new employee that needed coaching. They were also reminded of the GROW coaching model, as they have been throughout the course in order to make the learning 'stick.'
Upon pressing start, the learner can then have a voice-enabled conversation with the AI to practise using the GROW model. After completing the conversation, the learner then receives immediate feedback as to how well they have covered the GROW coaching model. This tool is impressive, but in future iterations, I would adjust the AI to include particular phrases to look for and adjust the level of feedback provided depending on how well the learner did in order to maximise its potential.
Mindsmith does have many benefits as an authoring tool. Most notably, it allows for rapid authoring, which is valuable if time and budget constraints are key factors. With specific and extensive prompting, iteration, and refinement based upon instructional design principles, it can be a useful tool for course generation. However, there are limitations in terms of just how editable the graphics are once generated, and image generation is likely best left to other tools. As a starting point for ideas, and a means of quickly sharing potential graphic design choices with stakeholders, Mindsmith is an interesting disruptor to the authoring tool market and I look forward to stretching its capabilities and experimenting with it further in the future.